2003/11/27 Thu AM 01:53:50 EST
Black Think Tank

Here are a few of the things learned at the Black
> Think Tank this month.

> Facts:

> 1. The first Americans or native Americans going
> back
> to 13,000 BC were black! Look up the Folsom people
> who
> lived in Arizona.

> 2. One of the best reason to stop our use of the
> term
> African American and say Black. A white person who
> was
> born in Africa, who moves to America is an African
> American and qualifies for financial aid, etc., but
> will get the jobs/pay privileges afforded to whites.

> 3. Look up the Slavery Law of 1665 (which stayed in
> effect until 1968) and the Maryland Doctrine of
> Exclusion (1638): both laws state that blacks must
> be
> excluded from the benefits afforded whites and that
> blacks must remain Noncompetitive with whites,
> except
> in sports and entertainment.

> 4. Two white men: Bill Gates and Larry Elision,
> combined have more wealth than the combined wealth
> of
> all 36 million blacks in America. Civil Rights did
> not
> change the economic landscape or the balance of
> power
> in America.

> 5. Asians received 80% of all government minority
> set
> aside contracts. Hello!!

> 6. Blacks eat more fish than whites by a 4 to 1
> margin. For every dollar whites spend on fish,
> blacks
> spend $9 on fish. Fish sold wholesale for $1 will
> retail at $2.50 - $3.00. Guess what business we
> should
> be in as Blacks?

> 7. There are no black owned national cable or major
> network television stations. The black woman who
> owns
> our only black owned radio stations, plans to sell
> to
> white owners after hearing the deal Bob Johnson
> received for selling B ET. (Cathy Hughes is from
> ...yall!)

> 8. There are no black owned companies on the Wall
> Street Stock Exchange where blacks own the majority
> or controlling
> interest
> of the stock.

> 9. Ninety-six % of all black inmates are men.

> 10. Over the next two years 440,000 black inmates
> will
> be released from prison. The State has no place to
> put
> them as they re-enter society. A profitable business
> would be . . . Halfway house!

> 11. In 1860, 98% of all Blacks in America worked for
> White people. In 2001. . . 98% of all Blacks in
> America still work for white people.

> 12. In 1860, blacks in America had a combined net
> worth of one half of 1% point. Guess what, . . .in
> 2001, after Civil Rights, Jesse Jackson, Oprah,
> Shaq,
> NAACP, and Urban League, our combined net worth is
> half a percentage point.

> 13. For every dollar earned by a Jewish person, that
> dollar touches 12 -18 Jewish hands before it leaves
> their community. For every dollar earned by a black
> person it leaves the community soon as he
> or she earns it.

> 14. The last week of April 2003 in Washington, DC
> black teenagers where arrested and booked for eating
> McDonalds on the metro subway. Cops cited the recent
> 5-4 court decision as the permission to arrest
> lawbreakers even for minor offenses.

> 15. Sixty-seven percent of all hate crimes in
> America
> are against blacks. After we get through being
> pleased
> that we have carpet in our office, a secretary, our
> name on the door and make six figures, we do not own
> anything. What will happen if you miss 6 months of
> work without pay? All we have left our children is
> debt not an inheritance. You cannot pass welfare or
> food stamps onto our kids as a nest egg! We are not
> even in the race.

> By the way, the word "race" hit the English language
> in the 16th century when Europeans held a contest to
> see who will win the race to gather the most wealth
> thro ugh exploitation of blacks.

> You must read Powernomics by Claude Anderson. This
> is
> our blueprint to create wealth, not just have a job,
> but be a business owner, so you can hire people, be
> listed on the stock exchange, develop businesses to
> meet our needs.

> This is "Good Food" for thought.

> Print this and put it on your wall, tell your
> children
> and your grand children and please... pass it on to
> all of your "Black Friends."


Evan Daniel Ravitz <> 
2003/12/04 Thu PM 02:47:14 EST
people: ;
9/11 Widow Sues Bush, Cheney, et al; media silent

Please send this out far and wide!... Evan


Widow's Bush Treason Suit Vanishes in Blink of Media Eye
by W. David Kubiak

"The decision 'not to do the story' appears to be multiplying all over
the nation." -- Fred Powledge, ACLU

"Whoever said `no news is good news,' was BADLY misinformed."
-- Dan Rather

Think you're already amazed, alarmed or appalled enough by the state
of US journalism today? Chew on this a while and think again.

Grieving New Hampshire widow who lost her man on 9/11 refuses the
government's million dollar hush money payoff, studies the facts of
the day for nearly two years, and comes to believe the White House
"intentionally allowed 9/11 to happen" to launch a so-called "War on
Terrorism" for personal and political gain.

She retains a prominent lawyer, a former Deputy Attorney General of
Pennsylvania, who served with distinction under both Democrats and
Republicans and was once a strong candidate for the governor's seat.

The attorney files a 62-page complaint in federal district court
(including 40 pages of prima facie evidence) charging that "President
and officials including, but not limited to Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice,
Ashcroft and Tenet":
1.) had adequate foreknowledge of 911 yet failed to warn the county or
attempt to prevent it;
2.) have since been covering up the truth of that day;
3.) have therefore abetted the murder of plaintiff's husband and
the Constitution and multiple laws of the United States; and
4.) are thus being sued under the Civil RICO (Racketeering, Influence,
and Corrupt Organization) Act for malfeasant conspiracy, obstruction
of justice and wrongful death.

The suit text goes on to document the detailed forewarnings from
foreign governments and FBI agents; the unprecedented delinquency of
our air defense; the inexplicable half hour dawdle of our Commander in
Chief at a primary school after hearing the nation was under deadly
attack; the incessant invocation of national security and executive
privilege to suppress the facts; and the obstruction of all subsequent
efforts to investigate the disaster. It concludes that "compelling
evidence will be

presented in this case through discovery, subpoena power, and
testimony [that] Defendants failed to act and prevent 9/11 knowing the
attacks would lead to "an 'International War on Terror' which would
benefit Defendants both financially and politically."

Press releases detailing these explosive allegations are sent out to
3000 journalists in the print and broadcast media, and a press
conference to announce the filing is held in front of Independence
Hall in Philadelphia on November 26th (commemorating the end of the
first futile year of the independent National 9/11 Commission).

Imagine the world-churning implications of these charges. Imagine the
furor if just one was proved true. Imagine the courage of this bribe-
shunning widow and an eminent attorney with his rep on the line. Then
imagine a press conference to which nobody came.

(Well, more precisely, imagine a press conference at which only FOX
News appears, tapes for 40 minutes, and never airs an inch.) Now
imagine the air time, column inches and talk show hysteria that same
night devoted to the legal hassles of Michael, Kobe, and Scott
Peterson, and divide that by the attention paid to our little case of
mass murder, war profiteering and treason. (OK, this is really a trick
question because no number divided by zero yields any answers
whatsoever, which evidently in this case is the result preferred.)

When you present documented charges of official treachery behind the
greatest national security disaster in modern history and the press
doesn't show, doesn't listen, doesn't write - just what in fact is
really being communicated? That despite all the deaths, lies, wars,
and bizarre official actions that flowed from 9/11 there's actually
nothing there to be investigated at all? That addressing desperate
victim families' still unanswered cries for truth is not a legitimate
journalistic concern? That news will now be what the corporate media
say it will be, so drink your infotainment Kool-Aid and kindly shut

(While the 9/11 blackout is the most flagrant sign of current media
dysfunction, it hardly stands alone. Where, for example, was our free
and fearless press when Pentagon powerbroker Richard Perle confessed
to a London audience last month that yes indeed, our war on Iraq was
illegal as hell? He calmly explained that "in this case international
law stood in the way of doing the right thing "[it] would have
required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone, and this would have been
morally unacceptable." (Guardian/UK, 11/20/03) And what news have we
seen of the thousands of Depleted Uranium deaths and birth defects now
desolating Afghanis, Iraqis and our own Gulf War troops? And whose
looking into the $1.2 trillion the Pentagon admits is "missing" or the
half trillion in laundered funds now propping up our banks? And how
many times have you seen it reported that unbid Iraq contracts have
pushed the worth of VP Cheney's 433,333 Halliburton stock options to
$26 million plus? But to return to 9/11, the funny business has just
begun. If you thought press performance after JFK's death was a
cynical farce, you ain't seen nothing yet.)

A few years back Harold Evans of the London Sunday Times, observed
that the challenge facing American newspapers "is not to stay in
business -- it is to stay in journalism.'' As corporations'
authoritarian, profit-driven consciousness comes to dominate both
media and governance, you can expect a lot more serial celebrity
scandals and even less news on the way things work or anything that
really counts.

There is a clear method and message in this obscurantist madness. All
this media consolidation and tightening control is strategically
aligned with deregulation, privatization, social program-gutting
deficits and free trade regimes. They are all convergent tactics to
enforce corporations' full spectrum dominance over democratic
humankind. If your progressive or conservative instincts bid you to
arise against this coup, standing with our 9/11 widow is a good place
to start.

Her name is Ellen Mariani, her lawyer is Phillip Berg and their
complaint is now online at
Read it and weep, wail, or whack out a dozen letters to the editors
around your town, but for god's sake make some noise. When 9/11
bombshells fall silent in the corporate media's forest it's up to us
to make them resound.

- End -

W. David Kubiak is director of Big Medicine, a research and education
institute studying the corporate takeover of our country, culture and
consciousness. His email is

(I worked with David on the National Initiative for Democracy in
Portland ME during the fall of 2002. Great guy! ... Evan)


Good critical commentary on the suit - comments will be heeded in future

"amendments"... (according to Attorney Phil Berg)


Mariani RICO suit mentioned in:

The Philadephia Enquirer
Posted on Wed, Dec. 03, 2003

A third have not filed for 9/11 fund

>From Michael Elliot:
Dec. 3

Ellen Mariani has filed a revised civil claim in Pennsylvania against
Bush Jr., Bush Sr., Cheney et al., claiming that they deliberately
failed to prevent 9/11 for personal gain, and that their subsequent
acts constitute an 'on-going pattern of criminal activity and
obstruction of justice' that supports filing the claim under the
Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO).

The claim is very well written, and clearly draws on the Internet
We have converted a copy of the revised Mariani claim on the net at:

The claim itself stands alone as a well written essay on 9/11; One
section we particularly liked was the explicit naming of the
defendants as "aiders and abettors and conspirators":

39. Plaintiff asserts from the mountain of evidence that will be
produced and based upon her RICO Act claim, Defendant GWB et al.,
exempt from the Act's jurisdiction in New York because Defendants
will be directly connected to their true standing in the "911"
attacks as "aiders and abettors and conspirators" who
intentionally and deliberately "failed to act and prevent" the
"911 attacks on the United States of American leading to the murder
of Plaintiff's husband Louis Neil Mariani and thousands of other
innocent people for many years to come, to advance their agendas,
including but not limited to an "International War On Terror."

We think that the evidence now is even stronger than what they have so
far presented, and will work with the plaintiff's counsel, Philip Berg
esq., to provide them with all the help and results of our 9/11

We note in passing that Mrs. Mariani was previously represented by
Mary Schiavo, and Philip Berg wrote this about her change of lawyers in
a press release date Sept 10, 2003 (available at

For two years Mrs. Mariani has fought not just United Airlines, but
her attorneys as well, firing both the Nolan Law Group and Mary
Schiavo of
Baum, Headlund, Aristei, Guilford and Schiavo due to their
inability to
exercise Mrs. Mariani's rights to the truth. Mrs. Mariani is now
represented by the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill,

Through Mr. Berg's office, Mrs. Mariani will now initiate acquisition
of all relevant facts and will pursue discovery even to the highest
levels of government regarding the secrets of 9-11.

>From Ellen's Lawyer Phil Berg, Esq.:

I am so excited - a few minutes ago, December 3, 2003, there was a knock
at my front door and a gentleman "Charles P......." told me he just
heard Ellen Mariani and myself on the "Alex Jones" Radio Show, a
nationwide show broadcast from Texas to 100 stations around the
country, and he handed me $9.11 cash, the first contribution of many to

Together, we will find out the "truth."

$9.11 for the "truth"

Thank you.


Phil, for and on behalf
of Ellen Mariani

Philip J. Berg, Esquire
911 For The "Truth"
706 Ridge Pike
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-1711

(610) 825-3134


Jews & The Black Holocaust
What Are The Issues?

Blacks and Jews have been involved in a re-evaluation of their current and
historical relationship. Events of the past several months have raised both
tensions and the level of rhetoric coming from all sides. The Secret
Relationship Between Blacks and Jews is a historical accounting of the part
of the relationship that has been ignored by both Blacks and Jews. Most
people are not even aware of the extensive record of encounters between
the two groups prior to the 20th century. The Honorable Louis Farrakhan
referred to this well-documented history in 1984 and was immediately
labeled an "anti-Semite." Merely questioning the belief that Jews were
co-sufferers in the Black slave experience draws angry rebukes from Jews
of all stripes. The book in question presents indisputable historical data from
census records, wills, Jewish historians and scholars, rabbinical sermons,
port records, court records, runaway slave notices, slave sale
advertisements, etc., which forces all sides to grapple with the long-held
mythology that Black people always found a friend in the Jews. 

Some Jews and their dutiful negros have hired the services of Dr. Harold
Brackman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in an effort to preserve the
comfortable mythology which has obscured the actual historical record. But
unbeknownst to them, Dr. Brackman's 1977 unpublished Ph.D.
dissertation, entitled The Ebb and Flow of Conflict, goes far beyond The
Secret Relationship in its claims of Jewish conspiracy in the Biblical origin
of White supremacy. He clearly states that Jewish Talmudic scholars
invented the Hamitic Myth which, through the story of Noah, everlastingly
assigned to the African the role of slave and divinely cursed servant of
White people. According to Dr. Tony Martin's book, The Jewish Onslaught,
the Jewish invention of the Hamitic Myth "provided the moral pretext upon
which the entire trade grew and flourished." 

"There is no denying," said Brackman of the story of Noah, "that the
Babylonian Talmud was the first source to read a Negrophobic content into
the episode..." Brackman pointed out further that two third century Jewish
"Sages" provided homosexual embellishments for the Biblical story as well. 

This "curse" was the absolute basis for the Europeans' choice of
dark-skinned Africans for chattel slavery. Many denominations of
Christianity, Islam and Judaism believe it and teach it to this very moment!
Southern plantation owners attacked the Abolitionists with it; its teaching
was the foundation of the slaves' permitted religion; Black inferiority is
based on it; the Ku Klux Klan relies on it; even the Mormons officially
taught it until 1978. When the Jews invented it and promoted it to the world
they sentenced the Black Race to a holocaust the likes of which no people
have ever suffered. "Hate teaching" will forever be defined by this wicked
belief system brought to us in the Jewish Holy Talmud via Harold

The critics curiously use a Harvard English teacher, Henry Louis Gates, to
offer historical clarity. Gates exhibits no evidence that he even read the
book in his oft-quoted NY Times opinion. His willingness to make asinine
historical claims with the glaring absence of support from reputable Black or
Jewish historians proves Adam Clayton Powell's axiom: "Harvard has
ruined more negroes than bad whiskey." 

Overwhelming Evidence 
The history that the old "Black-Jewish Coalition" clumsily avoids is the
entire three century history of Jewish presence in South America and the
Caribbean. But other highly acclaimed Jewish scholars have not been so

·Lee M. Friedman, a one-time president of the American Jewish Historical
Society, wrote that in Brazil, where most of the Africans actually went, "the
bulk of the slave trade was in the hands of Jewish settlers." 
·Marcus Arkin wrote that the Jews of Surinam used "many thousands" of
Black slaves. 
·Herbert I. Bloom wrote that "the slave trade was one of the most important
Jewish activities here (in Surinam) as elsewhere in the colonies." He even
published a 1707 list of Jewish buyers by name with the number of Black
humans they purchased. 
·Cecil Roth, writer of 30 books and hundreds of articles on Jewish history,
wrote that the slave revolts in parts of South America "were largely directed
against [Jews] as being the greatest slave-holders of the region." 
·"I gather," wrote Jewish scholar Wilfred Samuels, "that the Jews [of
Barbados] made a good deal of their money by purchasing and hiring out
·According to the Jewish historians, all Barbadian Jews owned slaves - even
the rabbi had "the enjoyment of his own two negro attendants." 
·In Curaçao which was a major slave trading depot, Isaac and Susan
Emmanuel report that "the shipping business was mainly a Jewish
·Says yet another Jewish writer of the Jews of Curaçao, "Almost every Jew
bought from one to nine slaves for his personal use or for eventual resale." 
·Seymour B. Liebman in his New World Jewry, made it clear that "[t]he
ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and
sailed under the command of Jewish captains." 
·Moshe Kahan stated bluntly that in 1653-1658, " Jewish-Marrano
merchants were in control of the Spanish and Portuguese trade, were almost
in control of the Levantine trade...were interested in the Dutch East and
West Indian companies, were heavily involved in shipping; and, most
important, had at their disposal large amounts of capital." 
·In Brazil, where most of our kidnapped ancestors were sent, Jewish scholar
Arnold Wiznitzer is most explicit about Jewish involvement: 

"Besides their important position in the sugar industry and in tax farming,
they dominated the slave trade. From 1636 to 1645 a total of 23,163 Negro
slaves arrived from Africa and were sold for 6,714,423 florins. The West
India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold
slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was
mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were
almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy
slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the
selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of
them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to
300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest
rates....If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish
holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October
21, 1644." 

Given the concise statements in the Jewish historical record, of which the
"Black/Jewish Coalition" is totally ignorant, how can it be taken seriously in
the present debate? (For even more evidence see the Facts and Quotes

Jews and Slavery in the Old South 
The Jewish critics prefer to focus on the history of slavery in America while
ignoring the kidnapped African family in other parts of the Western
Hemisphere. This attempt to focus the debate is designed to limit the
historical inquiry and to suggest that Blacks are to care only about their
Black family within America's political boundaries. This view also
conveniently limits the consideration of evidence of direct Jewish
involvement as whip-wielders in the slave trade which is so abundant in the
southern part of the Western Hemisphere. By the time of the Jewish
migration into what is now the United States, Jews were less involved in the
direct trade but remained significant beneficiaries by their involvement in the
plantation economy. 

Jews in the South were of the merchant class, according to a Jewish
historian, having developed "a separate and distinctive accommodation to
the plantation economy." The Southern planters depended upon these
merchants to move their produce to market as well as for a source of
supplies and financing. Jews had become commission merchants, brokers,
auctioneers, cotton wholesalers, slave clothing dealers, and peddlers,
keeping the slave economy oiled with money, markets and supplies. 

It is no mystery why the Jews were absent from representation in the ranks
of the Abolitionists. The American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society in their
report of 1853 expressed their frustration at the lack of Jews: 

"The Jews of the United States have never taken any steps whatever with
regard to the slavery question. As citizens, they deem it their policy to have
every one choose which ever side he may deem best to promote his own
interests and the welfare of his country. They have no organization of an
ecclesiastical body to represent their general views; no General Assembly,
or its equivalent. The American Jews have two newspapers, but they do not
interfere in any discussion which is not material to their religion. It cannot
be said that the Jews have formed any denominational opinion on the
subject of American slavery....The objects of so much mean prejudice and
unrighteous oppression as the Jews have been for ages, surely they, it would
seem, more than any other denomination, ought to be the enemies of caste,
and friends of universal freedom." 

One study by Ira Rosenwaike published by the American Jewish Historical
Society has shown that 75% of the Jews of the South owned Black slaves
while 36% of the White population owned slaves. 

Ask the Jewish critics to name one (just one) prominent Colonial American
Jew who did not own slaves. He will have the same difficulty as the
Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith had in their 1976 pamphlet
entitled, American Jews: Their Story. The ADL lists 13 pioneers of the
American Jewish community - 10 of whom have been definitively linked to
the slave trade. Some Jewish scholars of today, such as Jacob Rader
Marcus, chart the wealth and prestige of their ancestors by the number of
Black slaves they possessed. The point that the "Coalition" eludes is the
utter failure of Judaism to control this oppressive impulse on the part of
these Jews. As Rabbi Bertram Korn, the foremost scholar of nineteenth
century Jewish history, has written: "It would seem to be realistic to
conclude that any Jew who could afford to own slaves and had need for
their services would do so....Jews participated in every aspect and process
of the exploitation of the defenseless blacks." 

When Rabbi David Einhorn of Civil War era Baltimore, a true Jewish friend
of Black people stood up for the humanity of the Black Man using the holy
principles of Judaism from the Torah, his words were brilliant: 

"America of the future will not rest on slave chains or belittling its adopted
citizens. It will also give up its disinterestedness in the fate of other peoples
of the world....[T]he next battles will leave a real blood bath, but slavery
will be drowned in that bath." 

Alas, his own congregation physically expelled him from his position as
rabbi and ultimately from the city. They opted, as most Jews did, to accept
the "Judaism" of the most prominent rabbi of the time Morris J. Raphall: 

"[I]t remains a fact which cannot be gainsaid that in his own native home,
and generally throughout the world, the unfortunate negro is indeed the
meanest of slaves. Much had been said respecting the inferiority of his
intellectual powers, and that no man of his race has ever inscribed his name
on the Parthenon of human excellence, either mental or moral." 

The historical record is formidable and well-represented in The Secret
Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume One. Within 334 pages
there are 1,275 footnotes containing multiple references for the reader to
examine. The irrefutable record of Jewish historical compliance with Black
oppression is no longer a "secret." The debate has surely changed. 

The Washington Post has confirmed the accuracy of The Secret
Relationship while exposing the ignorance of its media critics. University of
Chicago African Studies professor and Jew Ralph A. Austen has written in
Tikkun Magazine that the "substantive content...seems fairly accurate."
Furthermore he says, "The authors of The Secret Relationship
underestimate the structural importance of the Jews in the early stages of
the New World slave trade." The Jewish Community, negro followers,
Harold Brackman and Henry Louis Gates might do well to investigate that
amazing assertion of this Jewish historian. 

Jewish Racism 
But what of the continuing Jewish racism that elicits no Jewish response at
all. No letters warning of some ominous trend. The African United Front of
Los Angeles raised many of these issues in a recent Final Call article: 

·Michael Levin of City College of New York, Vincent Sarvich of the
University of California at Berkeley and Richard Hernstein at Harvard are
among the most prominent Jewish scientists and scholars who maintain that
Black people are intellectually deficient. Hernstein's book Bell Curve
harkens back to some plantation philosophy claiming that Blacks are
intellectually inferior to Whites. Other Jews, including Howard B. Abikoff
of the Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Rachel Klein of the Long Island
Medical Center and Columbia University, and Gail Wasserman, in the
Department of Child Psychiatry at Columbia, are engaged in research which
has the potential to link genetics to violence in inner city Black and Latino
children. Where is the outrage, Coalition? Where are the calls for

·Journalists like Jeff Greenfield, Norman Podhoretz, Roger Rosenblatt and
other Jews have besmirched the Black image in news shows or on the
printed page. Jewish producers in Hollywood like Norman Lear, Mort
Lochman and Ed Weinberger continually produce degrading television
sitcoms, like Sugar Hill, produced by Armyan Berstein, Tom Rosenberg and
Mark Abraham. These portrayals can only be compared to Julius Streicher's
degradation of Jews in Die Sturmer in Nazi Germany. 

·The San Francisco Chronicle, the San Francisco Examiner, the Los
Angeles Times and numerous other newspapers have documented the fact
that for decades the ADL ran a private nationwide spy network - "a
systematic, long-term, professionally organized political espionage operation
complete with informers, infiltrators, money laundering, code names,
wiretapping and secret meetings." Newspapers have revealed that among
the 950 organizations and 10,000 individuals that the ADL prepared files on
were many Black groups, including the NAACP! 

There are many issues of varying degrees of significance that must also be
raised to clear the air: 
For thirty years Israel has maintained strong economic, military, nuclear,
scientific, academic, energy, tourist, cultural, sports, transportation,
agricultural and intelligence ties with South Africa - and thereby prolonged
Black oppression there. Jews were the only group in this country who
arrogantly threatened to protest the visit of revered African National
Congress Chairman and now President Nelson Mandela to the United States
in 1990. They have labeled Mandela and Bishop Desmond Tutu
"anti-Semites" while the 110,000 Jewish South Africans are, in fact, the
richest single community in the world. 

The late Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan asserted that the quality of
American military forces had deteriorated because they were composed of
Blacks "who have low intelligence and low education." He urged America to
ensure that "fresh blood and better brains go to their forces." He is a hero in

Jewish talk show host Howard Stern was quoted in the November 1st issue
of Time magazine as stating that, "they didn't beat this idiot (Rodney King)
enough." In March, he played Ku Klux Klan songs on his broadcast and
used the term "nigger" 55 times in 10 minutes. He offered the term "porch
monkey" and "yard ape" as labels for Blacks. 

Furthermore, during the week of March 7, 1994, Jewish comedian Jackie
Mason was quoted by news broadcasts as having said: "The susceptibility to
violence happens to be more among Blacks than whites - a hundred times

In 1991, Judge Joyce A. Karlin sentenced Korean merchant Soon Ja Du to
five years of probation, 400 hours of community service and a fine of five
hundred dollars for killing Black teenager Latasha Harlins. Judge Stanley M.
Weisberg transferred the Rodney King case to Simi Valley and thereby
virtually assured an unfair trial for the Black victim. Superior Court Judge
Roosevelt I. Dorn, a Black jurist who had been hand-picked to hear the
case of three men charged with beating Reginald Denny during the early
hours of the L.A. Civil unrest, was removed from the case by District
Attorney Ira Reiner. Karlin, Weisberg and Reiner are all Jews. Jewish
leaders did not repudiate them for their "racism" or "unfairness;" there were
no newspaper advertisements taken out to condemn them, nor were their
names dragged before congress to be censured. 

If the Jewish Community has a longstanding interest in providing accurate
information about history, culture and traditions of the Jewish community,
as some have claimed, maybe they should commence with one or more of
the above.