Cancer-Causing Vaccines, 
Polio, AIDS, and 
Monkey Business
2004 by Alan Cantwell, M.D.

The Global Polio
Eradication Program,
supported by the United
Nation's World Health
Organization (WHO),
UNICEF, Rotary
International, and the
U.S. Centers for Disease
Control (CDC), is
planning to immunize 74
million African children
in 22 countries in the
coming months. The
purpose is to stem a wild
polio epidemic, the
epicenter of which is
oil-rich Nigeria, the most
populous country in

The vaccine program hit
a snag last Fall when
Islamic clerics in the
Muslim-populated areas
of northern Nigeria
claimed the WHO program was a plot by westerners to depopulate the area.
Laboratory tests revealed estrogen and other female sex hormones in the
polio vaccine, proof that the vaccines were contaminated with substances
that could cause sterility. Furthermore, Nigerian officials became aware of
internet reports suggesting the WHO vaccine might be contaminated with
HIV (the AIDS virus) and other cancer-causing viruses. African blacks are as
suspicious of government vaccines programs as American blacks. A 1990
survey of African-Americans in New York City showed 30% believed AIDS
is an ethno-specific bioweapon designed in a laboratory to kill black people.

Dr. David Heymann, who heads the WHO eradication program, says the
oral polio vaccine (which contains live but attenuated polio virus) is
completely safe. He blames Nigerians for exporting polio to surrounding

The WHO, the world's leading international health and science agency, is
mired in power politics. For example, the Bush administration now restricts
communications between the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) and WHO officials. A new HHS policy requires the WHO to submit
all requests for expert scientific advice to political officials at HHS who will
then choose which federal scientists will be permitted to respond. The new
policy and two recent Administration decisions to withdraw federal scientists
from major international health conferences are part of a disturbing pattern
of political interference in global health issues.

Antifertility Vaccines and the WHO

In March 2004, Haruna Kaita, a
pharmaceutical scientist and Dean
of Ahmadu Bello University in
Zaria, Nigeria, took samples of the
controversial WHO's oral polio
vaccine to India for analysis.
Evidence of serious vaccine
contamination was found.
According to a March 11, 2004
report on, Kaita
was asked why drug
manufacturers would contaminate
the oral polio vaccine. He gave
three reasons: "These
manufacturers or promoters of
these harmful things have a secret
agenda which only further research
can reveal. Secondly they have
always taken us in the third world
for granted, thinking we don't have
the capacity, knowledge and
equipment to conduct tests that
would reveal such contaminants.
And very unfortunately they also
have people to defend their atrocities within our midst, and worst still some
of these are supposed to be our own professionals who we rely on to protect
our interests." Dr. Kaita is demanding that "those who imported this fake
drug in the name of Polio Vaccines- be prosecuted like any other criminal."

This is not the first time the WHO has been called on the carpet to explain
their surreptitious use of antifertility vaccines. Millions of female Mexicans,
Nicaraguans and Filipinos were duped into taking tetanus vaccines, some of
which were laced with a female hormone that could cause miscarriage and
sterilization. In 1995 a Catholic organization called Human Life International
accused the WHO of promoting this Canadian-made tetanus vaccine covertly
laced with a pregnancy hormone called human choriogonadotropic hormone
(HCG). Suspicions were aroused when the tetanus vaccine was prescribed in
the peculiar dose of five multiple injections over a three month period, and
recommended only to women of child-bearing age. When an unusual
number of women experienced vaginal bleeding and miscarriages after the
shots, a hormone additive was uncovered as the cause.

It is no secret that since the 1970's the WHO has been testing and funding
antifertility vaccine research that would make a woman's immune system
attack and destroy her own babies in the womb. In Geneva in 1989 the
WHO sponsored a Symposium on Antifertility Vaccines and Contraceptive

Third-world women who received the laced tetanus shots not only developed
antibodies to tetanus, but developed dangerous antibodies to the pregnancy
HCG hormone as well. Without HCG, growth of the fetus is impaired.
Consequently, the WHO's vaccine served as a covert and unsuspected
contraceptive device. Commissioned to analyze the vaccine, the Philippines
Medical Association found that 20 percent of the WHO tetanus vaccines
were contaminated with the hormone. The WHO has denied all accusations
as "completely false and without basis," and the U.S. media never reported
on the controversy. For further details, go to and type-in
"WHO + antifertility vaccine", or "Philippines + antifertility vaccine."

Following an eight month boycott, on June 24, 2004, the recalcitrant
Nigerians agreed to resume polio vaccinations, under the conditions the polio
vaccine had to be manufactured in Indonesia and nowhere else.

The WHO and the Man-Made Theory of AIDS

Unlike most Americans, Africans are
aware of the man-made theory of
AIDS, and the possibility that the
WHO's extensive vaccine programs in
Africa in the 1970s are connected to
the severe outbreak of AIDS in the
early 1980s.

On May 11, 1987, The London
Times, one of the world's most
respected newspapers, published an
explosive article entitled, "Smallpox
vaccine triggered AIDS virus." The
story suggested the smallpox
eradication vaccine program
sponsored by the WHO was
responsible for unleashing AIDS in
Africa. Almost 100 million Africans
living in central Africa were inoculated
by the WHO. The vaccine was held
responsible for awakening a
"dormant" AIDS virus infection on the continent.

An advisor to the WHO admitted, "Now I believe the smallpox vaccine
theory is the explanation for the explosion of AIDS." Robert Gallo, M,D.,
the co-discoverer of HIV, told The Times, "The link between the WHO
program and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis. I
cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years
that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a
dormant infection such as HIV." Despite the tremendous importance of this
story, the U.S. media was totally silent on the report, and Gallo never spoke
of it again.

In September 1987, at a conference sponsored by the National Health
Federation in Monrovia, California, William Campbell Douglass, M.D.,
bluntly blamed the WHO for murdering Africa with the AIDS virus. In a
widely circulated reprint of his talk entitled "W.H.O. Murdered Africa" , he
accused the organization of encouraging virologists and molecular biologists
to work with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make an
immunosuppressive hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. From the
Bulletin of the World Health Organization (Volume 47, p.259, 1972), he
quoted a passage that stated: "An attempt should be made to see if viruses
can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should
be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired
if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to
the virus." According to Douglass, "That's AIDS. What the WHO is saying
in plain English is Let's cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell
system of man, an acquired immune deficiency.'" The entire article can be
read on ("WHO Murdered Africa").

In his 1989 book, AIDS: The End of Civilization, Douglass claims the
WHO laced the African vaccines. He blames "the virologists of the world,
the sorcerers who brought us this ghastly plague, and have formed a united
front in denying that the virus was laboratory-made from known, lethal
animal viruses. The scientific party line is that a monkey in Africa with AIDS
bit a native on the butt. The native then went to town and gave it to a
prostitute who gave it to a local banker who gave it to his wife and three girl
friends, and wham - 75 million people became infected with AIDS in Africa.
An entirely preposterous story."

Indeed, in my two books on man-made AIDS - AIDS and the Doctors of
Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the Epidemic (1988) , and in Queer
Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot (1993), there is much evidence to
show that throughout the 1970s (the decade that preceded the AIDS
outbreak in the U.S. and Africa) there was widespread laboratory transfer of
animal viruses, particularly primate/simian/monkey/chimpanzee viruses, by
virologists. Various animal viruses were pumped into different species of
animals and into all sorts of cell cultures. This experimentation was
undertaken to find, create, and develop new cancer-causing and
immunosuppressive viruses. It is these species-jumping laboratory primate
viruses that are the source of "human" immunodeficiency virus (HIV) - not
the animals in the wild in Africa.

To researchers who believe whole-heartedly that AIDS is a man-made
disease, the evidence is crystal clear that the "primate ancestor virus of HIV"
jumped species via contaminated vaccine programs, namely the extensive
WHO-sponsored vaccine programs in sub-Saharan Africa during the 1970's,
and the experimental hepatitis B vaccine (1978-1981) that was injected
exclusively into gay men just prior to the outbreak of AIDS in America.
(More on this later.)

Cancer-causing Monkey Viruses and the Polio Vaccine

Americans have been told repeatedly that HIV/AIDS is the first time a
monkey virus has jumped species to cause a new epidemic called AIDS. But
the rarely-publicized truth is that a cancer-causing monkey viruses jumped
species a half century ago when contaminated polio vaccines were given to
millions of people on the planet, including half the U.S. population of that

In the early 1960's it was discovered
that some lots of polio vaccines
manufactured on rhesus monkey
kidney tissue during the period 1955
to 1963 were contaminated with a
monkey virus called SV40
(Simian[monkey] virus #40). This
primate virus was quickly proven to
cause various cancers in
experimental animals. However, to
this day, U.S. government officials
still insist there is no absolute proof
that SV40 causes human cancer.

Despite the lack of government
interest in SV40 in human cancer for
three decades, genetic and
immunologic studies by independent
researchers over the past decade
indicate this virus is clearly
associated with human cancer, such
as rapidly-fatal cancers of the lung
(mesothelioma), bone marrow cancer (multiple myeloma), brain tumors in
children, and other forms of cancer.

A Washington Times report (09/21/03) indicates "Some of the polio vaccine
given to millions of American children from 1962 until 2000 could have been
contaminated with a monkey virus that shows up in some cancers, according
to documents and testimony to be delivered to a House committee
Wednesday. The vaccine manufacturer said such claims don't have any
validity,' and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) agrees.
Documents set to be delivered to the House Subcommittee on Human Rights
and Wellness appear to show that the original "seeds" used to produce the
Sabin [oral] vaccine could have been tainted with SV40; that the company
that manufactured the vaccine, Wyeth Lederle, may have used Rhesus
monkeys -- which are more likely to carry the disease -- rather than the
African Green monkeys it says it used, according to company documents;
and that the company may not have performed all of the screening tests

Stanley P Kops is a lawyer who represents children and adults damaged by
polio vaccines. He has documentation indicating that the polio virus "seeds"
from which the oral vaccine is made are still not proven to be free of SV40.
In his article entitled "Oral polio vaccine and human cancer: a reassessment
of SV40 as a contaminant based upon legal documents", appearing in the
journal Anticancer Research (November 2000), Kops states: "In litigation
involving the Lederle oral polio vaccine, the manufacturer's internal
documents failed to reveal such removal [of SV40] in all of the seeds. The
absence of confirmatory testing of the seeds, as well as testimony of a
Lederle manager, indicate that this claim of removal of SV40 and the testing
for SV40 in all the seeds cannot be fully substantiated. These legal
documents and testimony indicate that the scientific community should not
be content with prior assumptions that SV40 could not have been in the oral
polio vaccine. Only further investigation by outside scientific and
independent researchers who can review the test results claimed in the
January 1997 meeting and who can conduct their own independent
evaluations by testing all the seeds and individual mono-valent pools will
assure that SV40 has not been present in commercially sold oral poliovirus
vaccine manufactured by Lederle."

More information on Kops, SV40, and polio litigation can be found at

More than 600 million doses of polio vaccine were sold by Lederle from
1963 to 1999. On Jan. 1, 2000, the CDC recommended injections of an
inactivated killed polio vaccine (IPV) that eliminates the risk of spreading the
disease, unlike the oral live polio vaccine that had been used for decades.
This prompted Lederle to get out of the polio vaccine business, and the last
batch of Orimune was produced on Dec. 31, 1999.

For anyone who still thinks that vaccine makers and government health
officials are always your friend, I would highly recommend a just-published
book titled AIDS. The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of a
Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, Contaminated Polio Vaccine, and the
Millions of Americans Exposed, by Debbie Bookchin and Jim
Schumacher. The book explores the history of the polio vaccine, the
contamination problems with SV40 , the ensuing vaccine-related cancer
problems, and the government's cover-up of the problem over the past three

Few people realize how dangerous vaccines can be and how complicated the
process of vaccine manufacture really is, particularly when vaccines are
made on living animal or human cells. Contamination with bacteria and
viruses and their elimination from the final product are constant problems
during the process. There are also recent suspicions that the laboratory
media used to feed and nourish the cell cultures upon which the virus is
grown may also be a source of contamination. For further details on the
dangers of vaccines, see "Are Vaccines Causing More Diseases than they are
Curing?" (

The Polio Vaccine/ Primate Virus Connection to African AIDS

In a 1,070 page book published in 1999, entitled The River: A Journey to
the Source of HIV and AIDS, Edward Hooper claims a 1950's polio
vaccine made using monkey (and possibly chimp) kidneys, contained the
ancestor virus of HIV which now infects millions of Africans. Hooper's
research greatly expands the polio vaccine man-made theory of AIDS first
reported by Tom Curtis in Rolling Stone magazine in 1992. When Curtis
asked the ubiquitous David Heymann whether the 1950's polio vaccine
might have contributed to the outbreak, the WHO official declared: "The
origin of the AIDS virus is of no importance to science today. Any
speculation on how it arose is of no importance." Quite an amazing response
from a man currently responsible for administering a possibly contaminated
live oral polio vaccine to Africa's children.

Hooper's book got extensive press coverage, greatly upsetting the AIDS
establishment which has always viewed any suggestion of AIDS as a
man-made disease as hysteria, paranoia or "conspiracy theory." Similarly,
my two decades of man-made AIDS research linking AIDS to 1970's
vaccine, as well as two books on the subject, were dismissed by Hooper in a
sentence in a footnote on page 897.

Not surprisingly, Hooper's vaccine theory was totally discredited the
following year by AIDS scientists and WHO officials at a Conference held in
London to debate the origin of AIDS, although Hooper still actively
promotes his theory on the internet. The retesting of the old 1950's polio
vaccine showed no evidence of a chimp virus. The molecular biologists also
came down hard on Hopper with their "genetic sequencing data" suggesting
HIV first entered the human population in the 1930's. (For details, google
"2000 London Origin of AIDS.")

Why it took HIV a half-century to produce an epidemic was not made clear,
nor was there any discussion as to how a black heterosexual African disease
could have transformed itself exclusively into a white gay man's disease in
Manhattan. Or why the epidemic broke out first in America in 1979 and was
only uncovered five years later in Africa.

Oral Polio Vaccine and Immunodeficiency

The public frequently receives bad news about AIDS in Africa. Millions are
dying, millions are infected with HIV, and millions of children are left as
orphans. And this is just the AIDS part of the various horrors connected with

Africans question why they are being given the oral form of the polio vaccine
(OPV) when this form was removed from the market in America in January
2000. The inactivated and killed polio virus vaccine (IPV) cannot cause
polio, but the live OPV is indeed capable of causing (although rarely)
paralytic polio. Equally dangerous is that OPV recipients shed live polio
virus, which is entirely capable of spreading polio to unvaccinated and
unprotected others. However, the oral form of the vaccine is the only form
recommended by health officials for outbreaks of polio epidemics.

Even if the IPV vaccine were effective, the cost would be prohibitive. A 5cc.
vial (enough to adequately inoculate 3 children with three separate injections)
is $US 300. Is this form of the vaccine totally safe? The expensive IPV is
thought to contain newly-discovered nanobacteria, which have been linked to
various diseases. The Vaccine web site claims nanobacteria
have been found to be a contaminant in previously assumed-to-be-sterile
medical products, specifically the IPV Polio Vaccine. Most human
biologicals and vaccines are made in fetal bovine (cow) serum, a medium
known to be contaminated with nanobacteria, as reported May 23rd, 2001,
at the 101st General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.

Bad vaccine reactions are increased in the presence of HIV,
immunodeficiency and malnutrition, which is purportedly common in
sub-Saharan Africans. So why is this not being considered? Will the WHO's
live oral vaccine awaken more "dormant" HIV? Nowhere could I find this
question being asked by WHO officials or other scientists. The WHO
vaccine for Africa (except parts of Nigeria) is made by Aventis Pasteur, a
multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in France. In 2003
Aventis donated 30 million doses to the program.

The Origin of AIDS and Monkey Business

A google search of the "origin of AIDS" lists an overwhelming 796,000

However, there are essentially three major theories of AIDS origin. The
AIDS establishment believes unanimously in the "official" monkey
out-of-Africa theory. Second is Hooper's polio vaccine origin, now largely
discredited or ignored. And third is the never-discussed "conspiracy theory"
that HIV was deliberately seeded into gay and black African populations as a
covert depopulation experiment with genocidal overtones.

Until 1999, it was widely believed that the African Green Monkey was the
source of HIV. This theory was highly touted by Robert Gallo, the world's
most famous AIDS researcher, who had done extensive animal virus
research forcing ("jumping") primate viruses between species in the Special
Virus Cancer Program (1964-1980) in the years just before the AIDS
outbreak. In 1975 Gallo reported on a "new" and "human" HL23 virus,
which eventually proved to be three contaminating ape viruses (gibbon-ape
virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims he
has no idea how these viruses contaminated his laboratory [Queer Blood,
p47]. For more information on pre-AIDS primate virus research, google
"primate research + Special Virus Cancer Program."

In 1999 there was renewed interest in the origin of AIDS. A media blitz
surrounded the finding of a team of researchers headed by Beatrice Hahn,
M,D,, at the University of Alabama. Viral studies on three African chimps in
the wild, and on the corpse of a frozen chimp named Marilyn, found
accidentally in a freezer at Fort Detrick (the Army's biowarfare unit), all
indicated a common subspecies of chimp was the animal source "most
closely" related to HIV. Hahn theorized the epidemic started when a hunter
cut himself which butchering chimp meat and subsequently became infected.
For details, google "Beatrice Hahn + Marilyn".

Hahn is no stranger to primate theories, having worked in Gallo's lab when
he was heavily promoting the green monkey theory in the mid-1980's. Her
publicized 1999 AIDS origin research, based on genetic and molecular
evidence, was quickly accepted as gospel by the AIDS establishment.

In 2003 she presented further details of her primate research, which was
again touted in the media. This time her findings were even more
impenetrable (at least to me). The most popular origin of AIDS web site
( summarizes Hahn's most recent findings in this
way: "The findings of this 10-year long research into the origin and evolution
of HIV by Paul Sharp of Nottingham University and Beatrice Hahn of the
University of Alabama were published in 2003. They concluded that wild
chimps became infected simultaneously with two simian immunodeficiency
viruses (SIVs) which had viral sex' to form a third virus capable of infecting
humans and causing AIDS. Professor Sharp and his colleagues discovered
that the chimp virus was an amalgam of the SIV infecting red-capped
mangabeys and the virus found in greater spot-nosed monkeys. They believe
that the hybridization took place inside chimps that had become infected with
both strains of SIV after hunting and killing the two smaller species of

American AIDS and the Gay Hepatitis B Experiments (1978-1981)

Due to space requirements it is not possible to give all the evidence pointing
to AIDS as a man-made disease. However, a Google search of "man-made
AIDS" lists 135,000 citations (not bad for a "conspiracy theory"!) and most
of my published research on the subject can be found on the internet ("alan
cantwell + man-made AIDS").

It is my view that the origin of AIDS cannot be determined without some
reasonable (and not homophobic) explanation of how AIDS originated in
America exclusively in young, predominantly white, previously healthy gay
men in Manhattan, beginning in 1979. To my knowledge, there is no
evidence to show that American AIDS originated in Africa. Furthermore, the
virus "strain" of HIV in the U.S. is totally different from African strains. This
finding has led AIDS researcher Max Essex of Harvard (and co-discoverer of
HIV) to suggest that there may be two separate HIV-1 epidemics - one in
which subtype B [the American strain] predominates and that is spread by
blood and homosexual sex, and a second involving the other HIV-1 subtypes
and primarily vaginal sex [as seen in Africa].

The onset of the "gay plague" and "gay cancer" (in the form of Kaposi's
sarcoma) are clearly associated with the hepatitis B vaccine trials which used
young gay men as guinea pigs during the years 1978-1981. A few months
after the first group of men were injected in the experiment in Manhattan at
the New York Blood Center, the first cases of "gay-related immune
deficiency" were reported to the CDC. The experimental hepatitis B vaccine
was developed in chimpanzees, the animal species now thought to harbor
"the ancestor of HIV."

Never mentioned by proponents of the chimp out-of-Africa theory is the fact
that the New York Blood Center established a chimp virus laboratory in
West Africa in 1974. One of the purposes of VILAB II, at the Liberian
Institute for Biomedical Research in Robertsfield, Liberia, was to develop the
human hepatitis B vaccine in chimps. The lab prides itself by releasing
"rehabilitated" chimps back into the wild.

Also closely allied to the "pre-AIDS" development of the hepatitis B vaccine
is the little publicized primate colony outside New York City called LEMSIP
(the Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and Surgery). Until disbanded in
1997, LEMSIP supplied New York area scientists with primates and primate
parts for transplantation and virus research. Founded in 1965, LEMSIP was
affiliated with the NYU Medical Center, where the first cases of
AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma were discovered in 1979.

HIV tests of the stored gay men's blood from the hepatitis experiment at the
New York Blood Center reveals that 6% of the men were HIV-positive in

By 1981, the year the AIDS epidemic became "official", 20% of the men
were positive! By 1984, 40% were positive! This means that this group had
a spectacularly higher rate of HIV than any group in Africa during the same
period - and at a time when AIDS cases were not even recognized or noted
in Africa.

It is clear that there is overwhelming molecular and genetic evidence to tie
SV40 related cancer cases to the SV40 contamination of polio vaccines. Yet
government health officials refuse to accept this research on the grounds of
"not enough evidence" and "contamination problems" connected with SV40
testing (See Bookchin and Schumaker's book). On the other hand, AIDS
experts try to convince us that a molecular HIV test on a dried-up blood
specimen taken from an unknown black man in the Congo in 1959 is strong
"proof" that human HIV cases existed in Africa back in 1959!! To me, the
explanation for this absurdity and inconsistency in science is simple: The
government does NOT want people to question the safety of vaccines, and it
wants to blame Africans and African monkeys for a disease that is most
likely caused by covert primate virus contaminated vaccine experiments, that
undoubtedly still continue to this day. For more documentation of covert and
unethical government-sponsored human experimentation , read In the Name
of Science: A History of Secret Programs, Medical Research, and
Human Experimentation [2003] by Andrew Goliszek.

AIDS scientists accept the fact that HIV was "introduced" into gays, but do
not publicize the fact that a second virus - the Kaposi's sarcoma virus, also
known as human herpes virus-8- was also introduced into gays at the time of
the gay vaccine experiments. Are two new viruses just another "accident of
Mother Nature"?

Two decades after the KS virus was "introduced" into gay men, it is now a
permanent virus in the blood supply, which is beginning (like SV40) to
appear in association with certain cancers. Twenty percent of "healthy"
Texas blood donors now carry antigens to the KS virus in their blood. As
many as 40% of Caribbean men with prostate cancer also carry the virus.

More details on the KS virus and the role of bacteria in KS cancer and other
cancers can be found in "Acid-fast Bacteria Discovered in Prostate Cancer"
(; and in my book The Cancer
Microbe: The Hidden Killer in Cancer, AIDS, and other Immune

It is clear to me that AIDS science is highly selective. Scientists who support
the African origin of AIDS are heralded. Scientists and researchers who
support the man-made, laboratory origin of AIDS are ignored as "conspiracy
theorists" or crackpots.

The Revenge of the Monkeys

AIDS scientists blame AIDS on promiscuity, homosexuality, dirty needles,
drugs, air travel, etc,, but never once do they seriously consider themselves
responsible in any way for the AIDS holocaust. Scientists quickly obscured
the primate virus origin of AIDS by calling it the "human" immunodeficiency
virus, a clever attempt to accentuate the "human" quality rather than calling it
by its real name -a simian (primate) immunodeficiency virus. Better to advise
people to not transmit a human virus, than to remind them they are
spreading an animal virus of dubious origin.

On the altar of science the primate populations of Africa are dwindling to
extinction. And the ultimate blame for AIDS is placed on primates who
cannot speak for themselves. Over the decades millions of animals have
been sacrificed for their kidneys and other organs to make vaccines which
are now creating new plagues of incurable AIDS and cancer and new
emerging diseases which in turn demand more animal sacrifice to make more
vaccines and drugs..

Monkeys, chimps, apes, gorillas, and human beings are all classified as
"primates." "Human primates" and "non-human primates" share 99% of the
same DNA. Yet, we treat them all as disposable beings, locking them up in
increasingly large numbers as slaves of science in animal gulags called
"primate centers" for the sole purpose of using them and their children as
hapless research tools.

As a physician, I am not against animal experimentation. However, I am
against foolish and excessive and dangerous animal experiments that expose
millions, perhaps billions of people, to disease and death from contaminated
vaccines and insane biological warfare creations. I do not believe we can
exterminate countless animals for our selfish purposes without some sort of
reckoning. What goes around, comes around.

Will the monkeys and the chimps get their revenge?. It's obvious it is already
happening. AIDS is depopulating the planet. Mad cow disease is a concern.
SARS is yet another deadly emerging disease. The list goes on and on.

There is no indication things will get better. Only worse. Isn't it time we get
over our fantasy that slaughtering these animals will somehow help us attain
better health?.

Deadly HIV and SV40 virus from primates have already co-mingled with our
human genetic material, changing our collective gene pool forever.

How many more people will have to die as a result of our lab atrocities and
our scientific ignorance? The more animals we kill for science, the more
people will die from "emerging" laboratory viruses. Admittedly this is a hard
concept to understand and accept when we have been conditioned to believe
that abusing and killing animals for science is in our best interest.

[Dr. Cantwell is the author of two books on the man-made epidemic of
AIDS: AIDS and the Doctors of Death, and Queer Blood, available from
Book Clearing House @ 1-800-431-1579 ad]