(Taken from “Commonomics II: The Sheep, Sheepdog and Evil Shepherd” http://noimoa.com/product/commonomics-ii-the-sheep-sheepdog-and-evil-sheperd/ )
Stolen Identity: Who, where, why and when?
Farrakhan and the Real Children of Israel
The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan caused a controversy in the Jewish community with his announcement that the Real Chosen People of God written of in the Old Testament are the Black people of America. He further stated that the Jewish people who currently hold sway in Israel and throughout the world do not fit the clear Biblical description. The Minister reasons that the Jewish people have never fit the criteria established in the Bible for the people that would wear that divine title.
The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan has boldly challenged four thousand years of traditional Judeo-Christian interpretation of Old Testament scripture by declaring that there is no way to prove biologically, anthropologically, historically, scientifically or scripturally that those who today are called Jews fit the category such a designation requires, and he has offered his life if anyone could disprove his controversial claim. It is this claim that is stirring up a major furor on college campuses across the nation as The Minister seeks to stimulate the thought process of the future leaders of America and the world.
At the root of this controversy is whether or not such a claim can be proved.
Based on the accepted interpretation of Old Testament theology the Jews were slaves in Egypt
for four centuries. After suffering unspeakably harsh treatment God sent Moses to demand that
the Pharaoh of Egypt release the captured Israelites or God would send plague after plague
until the people were set free. Pharaoh relented and upon being set free they wandered in the
Sinai Desert for 40 years before being led to their new “Promised Land.”
The only problem is that no evidence exists to corroborate such outlandish claims. And this is conceded by some of the most respected Israeli historians. There is no evidence of housing
units having been built to accommodate a million and a half people, no toilets, no farming, no
cattle; no transportation system uncovered, no utensils, no nothing. What has been traditionally
presented to us as history is largely mythology.
This Biblical episode is actually prophecy, not history. No ancient nation in the world has as meticulously detailed a written history as has Egypt. It speaks of the cuisine the average
Egyptian enjoyed 10 thousand years ago, what its population was, and the intimate details of
almost every aspect of their daily lives. And yet they have no history of a Jewish nation living
inside of Egypt for over 400 years. None.
Another aspect of the biblical relationship between Blacks and Jews is the story of the dueling twins in Genesis. Isaac has two sons named Jacob and Esau. The character, nature and
behavior of each son are polar opposites. Jacob, the younger son is stealthy, cunning, an
oppressor, cleaver, and dishonest. Jacob, in collaboration with his mother Rebekah trick his
dying father of his older brother’s (Esau’s) birthright.
Jacob the imposter then wrestles with God and he prevails. The King James version uses the word God, but some scholars use angel. In either case, this Jacob fellow seems to be a pretty
audacious guy. Before the battle is over God performs two acts: He cripples Jacob through the
sciatic nerve leaving him with a permanent limp, and he changes Jacob’s name to Israel. This
affliction of the sciatic nerve was also God’s sign that Jacob would forever suffer a permanent
disabling wound and he would never walk a straight path.
Esau, on the other hand, his birthright stolen, is made a slave by Jacob. However, the Bible promises Esau that one day he will break the yoke of his younger brother and he, Esau, will be the winner in the end. God tells Esau of his future in Genesis (27:1-40) in these words:
“By your sword you will live. And you will serve your brother. And you (Esau)…will break his (Jacob’s) yoke from your shoulders.”
Farrakhan has been singled out by the white Jewish establishment (Israel) because he has the audacity to remind the world what has been done to us, and by whom. Their fear is that he will influence the thinking of untold millions who are unaware of the damage that has been done to us by our Jewish “friends.” Their fear is that Black youth will be inspired by the truth of Minister Farrakhan’s teaching and Esau will break free of Israel’s control.
So, we ask today, “Who are the legitimate heirs of God’s covenant? Is it the children of the Black slave, or the children of the White slave master?”
The above paragraphs are a fitting introduction for this chapter of the book. Black people have had their identity stolen. We want to show how it was done, where it was done, when it was done and by whom. The first clue in this puzzle or crime is the fact that the first five books of the Bible supposedly written by Moses were not written by him. Instead they were put together by scribes during the supposed “Babylonian Captivity.” Judaism as we know it was formed in Babylon not Jerusalem using writings probably stolen from Egypt. Gerald Massey in his Book of the Beginning reprinted in 1987 argues that the original Bible was written in Egyptian Hieroglyphs not Hebrew. This corresponds to what The Honorable Elijah Muhammad writes in Message to the Blackman that Musa spoke “Ancient Egyptian Arabic” and therefore not Hebrew. Massey writes:
“Terru denotes the roll of papyrus, drawing and colours with the symbol of the hieroglyphic scribe. The Hebrew form of the word, Taroth, does but add the plural terminal which is Egyptian as well as Hebrew, and we have the Teruu, the hieroglyphic rolls of papyrus, whilst Haphtaroth denotes either the hidden papyrus rolls or the papyrus rolls of the law. It thus appears on this showing, that the Hebrews were still in possession of the papyri and possibly of the hieroglyphic writing which were preserved and read by the learned when the better known copies of the law were destroyed. Ezra is credited with founding the Great Synagogue, or men of the Assembly, which succeeded in establishing the regular reading of the Sacred Records, and with rewriting the law after the books had been burnt. ‘For thy Law is burnt, therefore no man knoweth the things that are done of thee, or the works that shall begin.’(2 Esdras 14:21)
This burning of the books is the destruction during the persecution when the Haphtaroth come into notice. The Haphtaroth being the secret papyrus rolls written in the sacred, this is hieroglyphical language, we now see that the work of Ezra, described with supernatural accompaniments, was that of re-translating the Law from the hieroglyphical or Ibri writing into the Chaldee of Ashurith, or the square letter.
Ezra dictated the translation during forty days and nights, and the five scribes wrote down what they were told by him. Which they knew not, as they did not understand the original characters.” (Massey 1987: 119)
Other scholars allude to the same conclusions as Massey, but they beat around the bushes instead of going to the bottom line. For instance Israel Finkelstein and Neil Silberman in The Bible Unearthed first gave King Josiah credit for finding the Law during renovations to the Jerusalem Temple in 622 B.C. (Sounds like Heru-tata-f who found a chapter of the Egyptian Book of the Dead in Khemennu.) However, after further analysis they write: “To sum up, there is little doubt that an original version of Deuteronomy is the book of the Law mentioned in 2 Kings. Rather than being an old book that was suddenly discovered, it seems safe to conclude that it was written in the seventh century BCE, just before or during Josiah’s reign.” (Finkelstein 202: 281)
There is no mention in the Bible or in Babylonian writings that the Ark of the Covenant or the Torah was brought to Babylon. So if the “Book of the Law” was destroyed in 586 B.C., then what Josiah supposedly found was destroyed and not rewritten until Ezra did so in 458 BC. (Ibid: 300). The “Second Temple” was supposedly finished in 516 B.C. But if there was no “Book of the Law” between 586 and 458 B.C., then what was in the Temple from 516 to 458 B.C.? You had a Temple with no Book until the Hebrew Bible was produced.
Therefore, the Hebrew Bible was born in “captivity” and authorized by the foreign kings of that “captivity.” According to the Bible (Ezra 7:6, 10): “He was a scribe skilled in the law of Moses which the Lord the God of Israel had given…For Ezra had set his heart to study the law of the Lord.” Then “Ezra was sent to make inquiries ‘about Judah and Jerusalem’ by Artaxerxes king of Persia, who authorized him to take with him an additional group of Jewish ‘exiles’ from Babylon who wanted to go there. The Persian king provided Ezra with funds and judicial authority.” This sounds a lot like a Persian colony being sent to Palestine to establish Judaism as authorized by Cyrus, a follower of Zoroaster.
The efforts of Ezra and the cupbearer of king Artaxerxes, Nehemiah, “…and the efforts of other Judean priests and scribes which took place over the one hundred and fifty years of exile (597-445 B.C), suffering, soul-searching, and political rehabilitation—led to the birth of the Hebrew Bible in its substantially final form.”(Ibid: 301)
I like that phrase “political rehabilitation”. That means “brainwashing” and the establishment of a Persian/Babylonian civilization in the name of Judaism. We have here the switching of the babies in the cradle. We will go further into this identity theft and fabrication as we dig into this so-called “Babylonian Captivity” and “Return.”
Deportation and Return???
In the ancient Near East deportation and return just was not done. It was not state policy at that time for Aryan and half-breed conquerors to take people from one area then later allow them to return to the same area. Let us read from the Bible Unearthed to see how it was really done: “Conquest and deportation were not the end of the story. After exiling the Israelites from their land to Mesopotamia in 721 BC, the Assyrians brought new settlers to Israel. “And the king of Assyria brought people from Babylon, Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, and Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the people of Israel; and they took possession of Samaria, and dwelt in the cities.” (2 Kings 17:24) …The ten northern tribes of Israel were now lost among the distant nations.”(Ibid: 199)
“Thus the Assyrians deployed a policy of deportation and repopulation on a grand scale. This policy had many objectives, which all served the goals of continuing imperial development. From a military point of view, the capture and removal of native villages had the effect of terrorizing and demoralizing the population and splitting them up to prevent further organized resistance. ..And finally, the systematic resettling of new populations in empty or recently conquered territories was intended to expand the overall agricultural output of the empire.” (Ibid: 216)
In other words there was no “return” of the children of exiled Israel back to their homeland. That just was not done. According to the Bible, the leadership class was taken into captivity, leaving the peasants and farmers behind. If Babylon or Persia sent back the children of that leadership class, those children would easily be able to unite with the peasant class with whom they had kinship, and produce a force that could compete with “headquarters” again.
Just as the Assyrians brought in people from outside Palestine to repopulate Israel in the past, Persia would have done the same thing. One might say that Persia and Assyria were not the same country. Each wolf in a wolf pack is different, but all follow the same leader until that lead wolf is challenged and a new one becomes the pack leader. However, they all are wolves in the same wolf pack and they all eat sheep. The Assyrians, Babylonians and Persians were all different tribes who were off springs from the invading Scythians or Aryans who took over these lands after their escape from the Caucasus Mountains after being trained by Musa (Moses). The Aryans, like lions, killed the males of the indigenous peoples, took the women and made half-breed babies which they trained to be warriors in their armies of conquest.
The people who came back to Palestine after the Nebuchadnezzar conquest were no more “Israelites” or “Judeans” as were the half-breeds produced by the Christianized-Jews who made half-breeds to infiltrate Africa in the 15th century A.D, “Africans.” White folk like to throw up in Black folk faces that it was “Africans who sold us into slavery.” But let us look at a practice that white folks have used over and over again to gain access to forbidden territories.
The Sao Tome Enterprise
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad taught us that the new white race came to live with the original people 6,000 years ago. Evidently at that time the people allowed these new white folk to live among them until they found out that they were devils. After which they ran them form among them. The white man had to invent another tactic and that tactic was to raid and steal black woman, rape them to produce mulatto children, then raise those children like a new breed of cattle to go in among the original people to trick them into doing business with their white fathers. Take the island of Sao Tome as an example,
In a new book, Jews and Judaism in African History, author Richard Hull describes how Portuguese in 1470 found an “uninhabited” island 120 miles off the coast of the kingdom of the Kongo. In the 1480s the Portuguese began capturing slaves in the “slave rivers” of the Bight of Benin. After they captured Kongolese female slaves they would bring them back to this island and breed them with white Jews and conversos (Jewish converts to Christianity) until they had produced a mixed population of mesticos. Some of these mesticos became rich and powerful on the island and laid the foundations not only of the trans-Atlantic slave trade but of the modern plantation system of agriculture that further evolved in the New World.(Hull 2009: 91)
So how would you categorize these mesticos? If you asked them, they would call themselves “Portuguese.” If you ask modern historians who want to blame the indigenous Africans for the slave trade, they would classify them as “Africans.”
We should look at what happened in Palestine 2,500 years ago in the same manner. Were the “returnees” the Children of Israel or the Children of the Babylonian/Persian rapists?
According to the Bible, the male children that were captured by the Babylonians were castrated and made eunuchs to be (bell-whether) servants to the Babylonian leadership. After King Hezekiah, king of Jerusalem, had entertained emissaries from Babylon, Isaiah the prophet declared: 2 Kings 20:17, 18
“17 Behold, the days come, that all that is in thine house, and that which your fathers have laid up in store until this day, shall be carried into Babylon: nothing shall be left, saith the Lord.
18 And of thy sons that shall issue from thee, which thou shalt beget, shall they take away; and they shall be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon.”
A “eunuch” is a castrated male.
Included among them was Daniel who according to the Bible served Nebuchadnezzar, Cyrus and Darius, but was never recorded to have married or fathered children. And since descent or lineage is passed down through the father, the dignitaries and royal families of Jerusalem could never have offspring to be “returnees”. Therefore, the only candidates for “return” were children of the raped women who had been brought up in the house of Babylon and Persia to serve the aims, wishes and gods of their masters.
According to the Bible these “returnees” were not supposed to marry people who lived in Judea although these were supposed relatives. The invaders, Pharisees (sheepdogs), kept themselves separate from the indigenous masses (sheep) and ruled over them for Persia (Magi, evil shepherds).
I had accepted this idea of captivity and return until I read one line in a book by Okasha El-Daly called Egyptology: The Missing Millennium (2005). It reads, “…it was suggested that a Babylonian king, Nebuchadnezzar, conquered Egypt and killed her lame pharaoh, then took back with him thousands of Egyptians who settled in Babylon.” (El-Daly 2005: 16) However, other historians argue that Nebuchadnezzar never entered Egypt. Now before I bring more evidence on this point, I must refer us back to our introduction and the statement that The Messenger wrote about Jesus going to Jerusalem looking for the “lost sheep.” We asked the question, “Who were these ‘lost sheep’ and how did they end up in Israel?” Also remember from your Bible studies that Jesus was taken to Egypt when he was a little boy by his parents. Did he learn about these “lost sheep” while he lived in Egypt?
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad has warned us about the “Poison Book.” Now let’s show how it can be manipulated in the hands of a snake. According to the book of Ezekiel, the “Sovereign Lord” gave him a prophecy about Nebuchadnezzar conquering Egypt. Bible scholars understood the problem this would bring to their whole Jerusalem/captivity/return model if indeed Nebuchadnezzar had conquered a real prize or kingdom (Egypt) instead of just a city, Jerusalem. However, to deny the fact that Nebuchadnezzar actually conquered Egypt and even built a huge fort there would make Ezekiel a false prophet and the Bible suspect. These passages from the 29th chapter of Ezekiel are illuminating from a number of perspectives.
Ezekiel 29:8-21 New International Version (NIV):
8 “‘Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says: I will bring a sword against you and kill both man and beast. 9 Egypt will become a desolate wasteland. Then they will know that I am the Lord.
“‘Because you said, “The Nile is mine; I made it,” 10 therefore I am against you and against your streams, and I will make the land of Egypt a ruin and a desolate waste from Migdol to Aswan, as far as the border of Cush. 11 The foot of neither man nor beast will pass through it; no one will live there for forty years. 12 I will make the land of Egypt desolate among devastated lands, and her cities will lie desolate forty years among ruined cities. And I will disperse the Egyptians among the nations and scatter them through the countries.
13 “‘Yet this is what the Sovereign Lord says: At the end of forty years I will gather the Egyptians from the nations where they were scattered. 14 I will bring them back from captivity and return them to Upper Egypt, the land of their ancestry. There they will be a lowly kingdom. 15 It will be the lowliest of kingdoms and will never again exalt itself above the other nations. I will make it so weak that it will never again rule over the nations. 16 Egypt will no longer be a source of confidence for the people of Israel but will be a reminder of their sin in turning to her for help. Then they will know that I am the Sovereign Lord.’
17 In the twenty-seventh year, in the first month on the first day, the word of the Lord came to me: 18 “Son of man, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon drove his army in a hard campaign against Tyre; every head was rubbed bare and every shoulder made raw. Yet he and his army got no reward from the campaign he led against Tyre. 19 Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am going to give Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and he will carry off its wealth. He will loot and plunder the land as pay for his army. 20 I have given him Egypt as a reward for his efforts because he and his army did it for me, declares the Sovereign Lord.
Now let us dissect these passages. First of all this is some pretty specific stuff. The “Sovereign Lord” was angry with Egypt because the people of Egypt claimed to have “made” the Nile River. Well this is true. The Ancient Egyptians did indeed build the Nile River as an engineer would build a road. You can see my proofs in I will not apologize: The resurrection of the Master Architect. But this “Sovereign Lord” is a real jealous fellow.
Then in verses 13 and 14 the Egyptians would be taken away from Egypt for 40 years and then returned to “Upper Egypt.” Well Upper Egypt would be Aswan or Elephantine where a Jewish colony was indeed established by the Persians at about the same time that the Persians sent their colony of half-breeds into Palestine. Since I don’t accept this exile and return to the same land, I will latter give a more realistic view of what happened.
In verse 19 the Sovereign Lord promises to pay Nebuchadnezzar for taking Tyre by giving him the “wealth” of Egypt. So evidently what was taken by Nebuchadnezzar from the Jerusalem Temple was not enough payment. If a sane mind would compare the wealth of the Jerusalem Temple to the wealth of Egypt at that time, that sane mind would say that the “Sovereign Lord” could not have bought Nebuchadnezzar with the Jerusalem Temple’s wealth. There is no comparison. Egypt had at least 42 temples that were all bigger and had more gold in each of them than did the one temple in Jerusalem.
I find it most interesting that the writers of the Bible had knowledge of Egypt up to “Aswan” at the first cataract in Upper Egypt. However, there is no mention in the Bible of the pyramids or the Sphinx which were near modern Cairo where the Nile branches out into the Delta which is considered Lower Egypt, because the Nile runs South to North. At first I thought that the pyramids and Sphinx were not mentioned in the Bible because its authors never made it that far up into Egypt. But now I see that the authors of the Bible were jealous of the greatness of Egypt. And this was why Egypt was such a great “prize” that the “Sovereign Lord” gave Nebuchadnezzar as payment for a job well done. The Bible begins to look more like propaganda produced by enemies of Egypt in Mesopotamia.
Fort Babylon in Egypt
As I studied Ancient Egypt and the pyramids I always wondered why was there a town or precinct called “Babylon” within the present city of Cairo. A 2010 book by Peter Sheehan, Babylon of Egypt, presents a history of Old Cairo based on new archaeological evidence gathered between 2000 and 2006 during a major project to lower the groundwater level affecting the churches and monuments of this area of Cairo known by the Romans as “Babylon.”
In his book Sheehan reprints a seventh-century account of John, the Coptic Bishop of Nikiu, of the conquering of Egypt by Nebuchadnezzar in 568 BC and the building of the fortress of Babylon:
“…Nebuchadnezzar the king of the Magi and Persians was the first to build its foundations and to name it the fortress of Babylon…Nebuchadnezzar came to Egypt with a numerous army and made a conquest of Egypt, because the Jews had revolted against him, and he named [the fortress] Babylon after the name of his own city…”(Sheehan 2010: 38)
The location of this fortress was strategic. Not only was it at the apex of the Delta, but was connected to a canal which Necho II had errantly dug in his attempt to connect the Nile with the Red Sea. After Necho II was defeated by Nebuchadnezzar at Carchemish in Northern Syria in 605 BC, Necho thought of digging a canal not far from the capital of Egypt, Memphis, to the Red Sea which would allow him to mount a naval attack against Nebuchadnezzar via the Red Sea, the Arabian Sea and the Persian Gulf. When warned about the danger of making such a canal that could be used in the reverse against Egypt, Necho halted the construction even after 120,000 men had died in the undertaking.
However, the Nile itself after an exceptional flood level made its on channel through the unfinished canal. This connection to the Red Sea allowed Nebuchadnezzar to enter Egypt at this very strategic point and conquer her. Even though some modern historians do not want to accept the fact that Nebuchadnezzar accomplished this victory, the 200 meter by 400 meter fort named after his city is proof.
According to what we read in Ezekiel 29, Egypt lay desolate under the control of Babylon/Persia for 40 years bringing us to 528 BC. Cambyses enters Egypt and destroys temples of all the gods except the Jewish god at Elephantine in 525 BC. He tried to reach Ethiopia but failed.
Chronology of major events (see Appendix C):
605 BC – A. Nebuchadnezzar’s reign begins, B. Nebuchadnezzar defeats Necho, C. Daniel
597 BC – Jerusalem attacked by Nebuchadnezzar and first deportation
586 BC – Jerusalem destroyed and second deportation
568 BC – A. Nebuchadnezzar enters Egypt builds Fort Babylon and B. Massive African
556 BC – A. Nebuchadnezzar’s reign ends, B. Belshazzar’s reign or Nabonidus’ reign begins
539 BC – A. Cyrus’ reign begins and B. First “returnees” to Jerusalem
530 BC – A. Cyrus’ reign ends, B. Daniel dies and Cambyses’ reign begins
525 BC – Cambyses destroys all Egyptian temples except Jewish temple at Elephantine
522 BC – A. Cambyses’ reign ends and B. Darius’ reign begins
519 BC – Darius authorizes the building of a Jewish Temple in Jerusalem
518 BC – Darius orders codification of Egyptian Laws
502 BC – Codification completed
458 BC – Ezra writes Pentateuch and Judaism is born
Where did Ezra get the material to write the Pentateuch or Torah?
Now that we know that the Pentateuch, first five books of the Bible, also called the Torah, was not in the possession of the Jews until their sojourn in Babylon. According to Jeremiah 8:8 New International Version (NIV):
8 “‘How can you say, “We are wise,
for we have the law of the Lord,”
when actually the lying pen of the scribes
has handled it falsely?”
So “Jeremiah” agrees with The Honorable Elijah Muhammad that the Bible has been tampered with, however the question remains is where did Ezra and the other “scribes” get the raw material from which to translate and change? If you remember, Gerald Massey wrote that Ezra had rolls of papyrus written in Egyptian hieroglyphics: “…Ezra dictated the translation during forty days and nights, and the five scribes wrote down what they were told by him. Which they knew not, as they did not understand the original characters.” (Massey 1987:119)
Ezra himself is an enigmatic figure according to the Bible Unearthed. He shows up from nowhere, dictates the five books of Moses to a number of scribes, takes his new Torah to Jerusalem, then disappears. Since he came to Babylon under the rule of Darius, we can now see where he may have gotten the raw materials from which to extract what he needed to please his patron, Darius. Darius had all the scribes and learned men of Egypt to spend 16 years transcribing what they saw on the walls of the temples in Egypt and place that information on papyrus rolls. (Remember what Gerald Massey wrote about these papyrus rolls.)
Sixteen years is a lot of time, therefore the volume of writings must have been immense. I visited Egypt in 1989 and the amount of writings on the walls of the few restored temples that I visited was tremendous.
Darius was a lot wiser than the Assyrians who conquered Egypt and took her capital, Memphis, in 667 BC, only to see Egyptians return from their original home, Ethiopia, kick them out and run them back to Turkey. Cambyses tried to get to Ethiopia but almost died in the deserts of Nubia before he could reach Ethiopia (see Appendix). Darius took a different route. The Persians put half-breeds at the two gates of Egypt, Jerusalem and Elephantine, then they destroyed the temples, took all the books, then fabricated a new Book of history and a new religion for these new Jews, giving everybody a new identity based on the political and theological framework of Persia/Babylonia/Iran. It worked.
Ben Ezra Synagogue
The Jews love their history and do all they can to control anything that they believe once belonged to them. A case in point is the decision by Abraham ibn Ezra of Jerusalem in 882 AD to purchase land within Fort Babylon for the erection of a synagogue which is called the Ben Ezra Synagogue or the El-Geniza Synagogue. This was the synagogue whose geniza or store room was found in the 19th century to contain a treasure of abandoned Hebrew secular and sacred manuscripts. The collection, known as the Cairo Geniza, was brought to Cambridge, England at the instigation of Solomon Schechter and is now divided between several academic libraries. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Ezra_Synagogue)
It may just be a coincidence that a synagogue set up by a Rabbi named after Ezra who is credited with restoring the Bible and probably had volumes of Egyptian manuscripts to work from, also was a storage house in the Babylon of Egypt for ancient Hebrew manuscripts. Could this be the place where Ezra actually did his work in the service of Darius who had the law of Egypt codified? I’m just thinking out loud.
Your father, the devil
John 8:33, 44
33 They answered him, “We are Abraham’s descendants and have never been slaves of anyone. How can you say that we shall be set free?”
44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Now let us go back to these words ascribed to Jesus in the Book of John. How can a people be Abraham’s seed, but never being a slave and whose father is “the devil”? Jesus was arguing with the Pharisees, so let us look at them from the perspective of the paradigm that I have presented above; the so-called returnees to Jerusalem were the products from the rape of African/Egyptian women by the Babylonians/Persians. Therefore, through the female they may have the seed of Abraham, but through rape, the seed of the devil, white man, was forcedly placed in them and that seed of the devil is what is arguing with Jesus.
Another clue to this paradigm is the name of the first governor of Judea after the “Captivity”, Zerubbabel which means “seed of Babylon.” Zerubbabel was put in charge of collecting taxes for Persia and given the charge by Darius of building the Temple in Jerusalem. Since Zerubbabel had no Hebrew Bible, his main function must have been tax collection for Persia. The “seed of Babylon” takes on a new skin and shrouds itself in “mystery” as it passes from generation to generation, chapter to chapter up to Revelations.
Return of the Khazarians (Scythians)
In the 2003 book I Will Not Apologize: Resurrection of the Master Architect I wrote: “According to Arthur Koestler in his book, The Thirteenth Tribe, those of European descent who call themselves Jews were a tribe north of the Black Sea who converted to Judaism during the Dark Ages. Therefore they were not descendants of Abraham or Shem, but Japhet. Since Western Jews are only Jews by faith and not lineage, how can they be Jews yet not follow Judaism? Therefore, I call them so-called Jews.”(Mu’min 2003: 151)
In appendix “F” of this chapter we have printed portions of an article reporting the DNA research findings of Eran Elhaik, a Jew, where he verified the “Khazarian Hypotheses” as being the best explanation of the origins of European Jews. This Khazarian Hypotheses suggests that Eastern European Jews are descendants of ancient and late Judeans who joined the Khazars, a confederation of Slavic, Scythian, Sabirs, Finno-Ugrian, Alan, Avars, Iranian, and Turkish tribes who formed in the northern Caucasus one of most powerful and pluralistic empires during the late Iron Age and converted to Judaism in the 8th century CE.
Now based on the information presented in this book let us try to piece together the history of the European white Jews, Ashkenazim. First of all white people were made on the Island of Pelan or Patmos in the Aegean Sea 6,000 years ago. They moved into the Holy Land and started mischief causing the original people to fight and kill one another. They were kicked out and driven across the desert and placed in the Caucasus Mountains. The Egyptians built walls and iron gates to keep them in. Soldiers were left to guard the walls. We now know that the Colchians, as highlighted by Herodotus, were once among those Egyptian soldiers.
Research by archaeologists and anthropologists now bear witness to The Honorable Elijah Muhammad and say that a new white race appeared in the Caucasus Mountains about 4,000 BC or 6,000 years ago which they called the “Kurgan culture.” These whites killed or enslaved the indigenous darker peoples who lived north of the Caucasus Mountains between the Volga River and Black Sea 6,000 years ago. Musa (Moses), a half original, came 2,000 years later and civilized some of these whites then called Scythians. The whites that he civilized first conquered Mesopotamia then Egypt. They were kicked out of Egypt, but they stayed and mixed with the indigenous peoples in Mesopotamia producing the Persian and Babylonian Semites. We know that Moses gave them a book, but we now know that we do not have the original book that he wrote. Instead we have the Bible (Old Testament) that the priests in Babylon, Ezra and company, produced in 458 BC and after. Through this Bible and Babylonian Talmud was developed what we know today as Rabbinical Judaism.
Over time the Persians through Darius and the Greeks through Alexander the Great defeated the Scythians and again bottled them up behind the Caucasus Mountains.
However, in 740 CE (almost 1200 years later) Jews from Babylon went up behind the Caucasus Mountains and converted the Khazarians (Scythians) to Judaism which looked a lot like what Moses (Musa) taught to their ancestors 2,800 years previous (2000 BC). So in one sense when the Khazarians accepted Judaism, they were accepting something similar to what they were taught by Moses. But the book and the religion had been tampered with by their ancestors, Scythians, who had conquered the indigenous people in Mesopotamia and made a mixed race, Semites, called the Jews which they relocated in Judea, Palestine and Elephantine, Egypt.
So white European Jews, Khazarians, Ashkenazim, have accepted a corrupted version of what Musa (Moses) had taught their ancestors and they, the Khazarians (Ashkenazim), had all but forgotten. But now they had Jacob, the usurper, liar and crook (evil shepherd) to study all over again, so that they could finally establish the “Jewish Civilization” which now rules the world through “money and banking.” They have made their headquarters in Israel, not because God gave them Palestine as the “Promised Land”, but because England and America wants them lodged in the Middle East to be a counterweight to Islam and control the oil. They will not have full hegemony until they conquer Egypt, “The Prize.”
As a shepherd studies sheep, the evil shepherd (Jews), studies human nature so as to better fleece them. Chapter 5 will go into the details of how the Jews have built their civilization through control of the money supply. The Jews (Evil Shepherd) now control the sheep (the original people) and the sheepdog (non-Jewish whites) with their crook (Poison Book) and their money (green pastures).
Appendix to Chapter 4
Mind you that Darius’ predecessor, Cambyses, destroyed all the Egyptian temples except the Jewish temple at Elephantine. Later these same “Jews” were used as spies against Ethiopia. Evidently they were spies against Egypt for Cambyses and the Persians before they invaded Egypt.
So they tried to destroy the Egyptian records while preserving them for themselves and later Ezra comes out with a new Torah from Babylon with a colony of Jews to resettle Jerusalem. This new set of Jews would not accept those that were not deported to Babylon, the Samaritans. Jacob has now successfully stolen the birthright of Esau, the first born, i.e., Egypt, the first civilization and civilizer.
Conclusions to Part I
The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad said that we as a people were “buried” in this “poison” book. He writes on the back of Muhammad Speaks and now on the inside cover of The Final Call under “What The Muslims Believe”: “4. WE BELIEVE in the truth of the Bible, but we believe that it has been tampered with and must be reinterpreted so that mankind will not be snared by the falsehoods that have been added to it.”
The Teachings of the Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad breaks through the clouds of confusion produced by the Bible and gives us a proper lens to see through and evaluate that book. With this lens and keys we can then go to libraries and find the morsels of truth that bear witness to The Messenger’s Teachings and allows us to piece together the real history of the world using the road markers provided in our lessons. We can essentially fill in the gaps between firm historical markers given to us by The Messenger’s Teachings.
At the same time we must realize that even though the Bible has been tampered with, it was put together from scripture given to Moses and copied from writings on the walls of Ancient Egypt. When the enemy tampered with these writings, his intent was to place themselves in the place of the Real Children of Israel or Chosen People. However, what they did was to actually preserve and pass on to God’s Chosen People the information waiting for the Messiah to come and reinterpret these scriptures. What the enemy messed up or stunk up as “history”, he passed on as “prophecy” by mistake. It was his mistake but Allah’s plan. Just as he made the mistake of bringing Black people from Africa to be made slaves and suffer for 400 years, Allah used his own hands as an instrument of his undoing
As stated earlier in this chapter, our Scientists wrote history 25,000 years in advance. They saw Mr. Yakub 8,400 years before he was born. They knew what he would make and they knew how his made man would think. They had already prepared a way for our redemption. They knew that the grafted man would change scripture and steal our identity. They knew that our enemies would take us to a strange land and take away our religion and language. How could the Scientists 15,000 years ago figure out a way to teach these blind, deaf and dumb people who would be in the grips of a new man with a new language?
In Ancient Egypt there was a “neter” or scientific principle represented by a scarab or beetle called “khepera”. The beetle insect was very important to the Egyptians because a variety known as the “dung beetle” feed exclusively on dung. They would transform this dung into fertilizer. So they cleaned the sewers as well and provided nutriment for plants. The way they reproduced themselves was by rolling their eggs in dung. The dung would provide heat for incubation and hatching. Then this dung would be used as food for the new beetles.
In the same way the knowledge needed for rebirth or resurrection was hidden in an unpleasant (confusing) form to be passed on to a new generation awaiting The Messiah to clear up the confusion. At first, the enemy would not allow his slaves to read the Bible. However, after Nat Turner used it to start a rebellion, the enemy decided to train a few Negro preachers (bell-wether sheep) the “proper” interpretation of the Bible that would not resurrect the deadened mind of the slave. Now this book that had been made into a poison was in the hands of his former slaves. But now 400 years after our captivity this same book under the Messianic interpretation can be used for the Resurrection of a mentally dead people.
We must always remember what The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad taught: “As the Holy Qur-an teaches, they planned against us, but Allah also has plans, and He is the best of planners.” (Muhammad 1965: 296)